Paper detail

Cooperation principle, stability and bifurcation in random complex dynamics

We investigate random complex dynamics of rational or polynomial maps on the Riemann sphere. We show that regarding random complex dynamics of polynomials, generically, the chaos of the averaged system disappears at any point in the Riemann sphere due to the automatic coopeartion of many kinds of maps in the system, even though each map of the system has a chaotic part. Moreover, we show that (1) the set of stable systems is open and dense in the space of random dynamical systems of polynomials, and (2) for a stable system, there exist at most finitely many minimal sets and each minimal set is attracting. These (1) and (2) solve a random analogy of the most famous open conjecture in complex dynamics "hyperbolic rational maps are dense in the space of rational maps." Furthermore, we show that for a stable system, the orbit of a Hölder continuous function under the transition operator tends exponentially fast to the finite-dimensional space $U$ of finite linear combinations of unitary eigenvectors of the transition operator. From this, we obtain that the spectrum of the transition operator acting on the space of Hölder continuous functions has a gap between the set of unitary eigenvalues and the rest. Combining this with the perturbation theory for linear operators, we obtain that for a stable system constructed by a finite family of rational maps, the projection to the space $U$ depends real-analytically on the probability parameters. By taking a partial derivative of the function of probability of tending to a minimal set with respect to a probability parameter, we introduce a complex analogue of the Takagi function, which is a new concept. Many new phenomena which can hold in random complex dynamics but cannot hold in usual iteration dynamics of a single rational map are found and systematically investigated.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.