Paper detail

Cooperation Alignment for Distributed Interference Management

We consider a cooperative Gaussian interference channel in which each receiver must decode its intended message locally, with the help of cooperation either at the receivers side or at the transmitter side. In the case of receiver cooperation, the receivers can process and share information through limited capacity backhaul links. In contrast to various previously considered distributed antenna architectures, where processing is utterly performed in a centralized fashion, the model considered in this paper aims to capture the essence of decentralized processing, allowing for a more general class of "interactive" interference management strategies. Focusing on the three-user case, we characterize the fundamental tradeoff between the achievable communication rates and the corresponding backhaul cooperation rate, in terms of degrees of freedom (DoF). Surprisingly, we show that the optimum communication-cooperation tradeoff per user remains the same when we move from two-user to three-user interference channels. In the absence of cooperation, this is due to interference alignment, which keeps the fraction of communication dimensions wasted for interference unchanged. When backhaul cooperation is available, we develop a new idea that we call cooperation alignment, which guarantees that the average (per user) backhaul load remains the same as we increase the number of users. In the case of transmitter cooperation, the transmitters can form their jointly precoded signals through an interactive protocol over the backhaul. In this case, we show that the optimal (per user) tradeoff between the achievable communication rates and the corresponding backhaul cooperation rate in the three-user case is the same as for receiver cooperation.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.