Paper detail

Convolution/deconvolution of generalized Gaussian kernels with applications to proton/photon physics and electron capture of charged particles

Scatter processes of photons lead to blurring of images produced by CT (computed tomography) or CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) in the KV domain or portal imaging in the MV domain (KV: kilovolt age, MV: megavoltage). Multiple scatter is described by, at least, one Gaussian kernel. In various situations, this approximation is crude, and we need two/three Gaussian kernels to account for the long-range tails (Landau tails), which appear in the Molière scatter of protons, energy straggling and electron capture of charged particles passing through matter and Compton scatter of photons. The ideal image (source function) is subjected to Gaussian convolutions to yield a blurred image recorded by a detector array. The inverse problem is to obtain the ideal source image from measured image. Deconvolution methods of linear combinations of two/three Gaussian kernels with different parameters s0, s1, s2 can be derived via an inhomogeneous Fredholm integral equation of second kind (IFIE2) and Liouville - Neumann series (LNS) to provide the source function ρ. The determination of scatter parameter functions s0, s1, s2 can be best determined by Monte-Carlo simulations. A particular advantage of this procedure is given, if the scatter functions s0, s1, s2 are not constant and depend on coordinates. This fact implies that the scatter functions can be calibrated according to the electron density ρelectron provided by image reconstructions. The convergence criterion of LNS can always be satisfied with regard to the above mentioned cases. A generalization of the present theory is given by an analysis of convolution problems based on the Dirac equation and Fermi-Dirac statistics leading to Landau tails. This generalization is applied to Bethe-Bloch equation (BBE) of charged particles to analyze electron capture. The methodology can readily be extended to other disciplines of physics.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.