Paper detail

Convexity and uncertainty in operational quantum foundations

To find the essential nature of quantum theory has been an important problem for not only theoretical interest but also applications to quantum technologies. In those studies on quantum foundations, the notion of uncertainty plays a primary role among several stunning features of quantum theory. The purpose of this thesis is to investigate fundamental aspects of uncertainty. In particular, we address this problem focusing on convexity, which has an operational origin. We first try to reveal why in quantum theory similar bounds are often obtained for two types of uncertainty relations, namely, preparation and measurement uncertainty relations. To do this, we consider uncertainty relations in the most general framework of physics called generalized probabilistic theories (GPTs). It is proven that some geometric structures of states connect those two types of uncertainty relations in GPTs in terms of several expressions such as entropic one. Our result implies what is essential for the close relation between those uncertainty relations. Then we consider a broader expression of uncertainty in quantum theory called quantum incompatibility. Motivated by an operational intuition, we propose and investigate new quantifications of incompatibility which are related directly to the convexity of states. It is also shown that there can be observed a notable phenomenon for those quantities even in the simplest incompatibility for a pair of mutually unbiased qubit observables. Finally, we study thermodynamical entropy of mixing in quantum theory, which also can be seen as a quantification of uncertainty. We consider its operationally natural extension to GPTs, and then try to characterize how specific the entropy in quantum theory is. It is shown that the operationally natural entropy is allowed to exist only in classical and quantum-like theories among a class of GPTs called regular polygon theories.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.