Paper detail

Conversion of Mersenne Twister to double-precision floating-point numbers

The 32-bit Mersenne Twister generator MT19937 is a widely used random number generator. To generate numbers with more than 32 bits in bit length, and particularly when converting into 53-bit double-precision floating-point numbers in $[0,1)$ in the IEEE 754 format, the typical implementation concatenates two successive 32-bit integers and divides them by a power of $2$. In this case, the 32-bit MT19937 is optimized in terms of its equidistribution properties (the so-called dimension of equidistribution with $v$-bit accuracy) under the assumption that one will mainly be using 32-bit output values, and hence the concatenation sometimes degrades the dimension of equidistribution compared with the simple use of 32-bit outputs. In this paper, we analyze such phenomena by investigating hidden $\mathbb{F}_2$-linear relations among the bits of high-dimensional outputs. Accordingly, we report that MT19937 with a specific lag set fails several statistical tests, such as the overlapping collision test, matrix rank test, and Hamming independence test.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.