Paper detail

Convergence Rates for Exponentially Ill-Posed Inverse Problems with Impulsive Noise

This paper is concerned with exponentially ill-posed operator equations with additive impulsive noise on the right hand side, i.e. the noise is large on a small part of the domain and small or zero outside. It is well known that Tikhonov regularization with an $L^1$ data fidelity term outperforms Tikhonov regularization with an $L^2$ fidelity term in this case. This effect has recently been explained and quantified for the case of finitely smoothing operators. Here we extend this analysis to the case of infinitely smoothing forward operators under standard Sobolev smoothness assumptions on the solution, i.e. exponentially ill-posed inverse problems. It turns out that high order polynomial rates of convergence in the size of the support of large noise can be achieved rather than the poor logarithmic convergence rates typical for exponentially ill-posed problems. The main tools of our analysis are Banach spaces of analytic functions and interpolation-type inequalities for such spaces. We discuss two examples, the (periodic) backwards heat equation and an inverse problem in gradiometry.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.