Paper detail

Convergence rates and $W^{1,p}$ estimates in homogenization theory of Stokes systems in Lipschitz domains

Concerned with the Stokes systems with rapidly oscillating periodic coefficients, we mainly extend the recent works in \cite{SGZWS,G} to those in term of Lipschitz domains. The arguments employed here are quite different from theirs, and the basic idea comes from \cite{QX2}, originally motivated by \cite{SZW2,SZW12,TS}. We obtain an almost-sharp $O(\varepsilon\ln(r_0/\varepsilon))$ convergence rate in $L^2$ space, and a sharp $O(\varepsilon)$ error estimate in $L^{\frac{2d}{d-1}}$ space by a little stronger assumption. Under the dimensional condition $d=2$, we also establish the optimal $O(\varepsilon)$ convergence rate on pressure terms in $L^2$ space. Then utilizing the convergence rates we can derive the $W^{1,p}$ estimates uniformly down to microscopic scale $\varepsilon$ without any smoothness assumption on the coefficients, where $|\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{2}|<\frac{1}{2d}+ε$ and $ε$ is a positive constant independent of $\varepsilon$. Combining the local estimates, based upon $\text{VMO}$ coefficients, consequently leads to the uniform $W^{1,p}$ estimates. Here the proofs do not rely on the well known compactness methods.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.