Paper detail

Convergence rates analysis of a multiobjective proximal gradient method

Many descent algorithms for multiobjective optimization have been developed in the last two decades. Tanabe et al. (Comput Optim Appl 72(2):339--361, 2019) proposed a proximal gradient method for multiobjective optimization, which can solve multiobjective problems, whose objective function is the sum of a continuously differentiable function and a closed, proper, and convex one. Under reasonable assumptions, it is known that the accumulation points of the sequences generated by this method are Pareto stationary. However, the convergence rates were not established in that paper. Here, we show global convergence rates for the multiobjective proximal gradient method, matching what is known in scalar optimization. More specifically, by using merit functions to measure the complexity, we present the convergence rates for non-convex ($O(\sqrt{1 / k})$), convex ($O(1 / k)$), and strongly convex ($O(r^k)$ for some $r \in (0, 1)$) problems. We also extend the so-called Polyak-Łojasiewicz (PL) inequality for multiobjective optimization and establish the linear convergence rate for multiobjective problems that satisfy such inequalities ($O(r^k)$ for some $r \in (0, 1)$).

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.