Paper detail

Convergence Rate of Inertial Forward-Backward Algorithms Based on the Local Error Bound Condition

The "Inertial Forward-Backward algorithm" (IFB) is a powerful tool for convex nonsmooth minimization problems, it gives the well known "fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm " (FISTA), which enjoys $O\left( {\frac{1}{k^2}} \right)$ global convergence rate of function values, however, no convergence of iterates has been proved; by do a small modification, an accelerated IFB called "FISTA\_CD" improves the convergence rate of function values to $o\left( {\frac{1}{k^2}} \right)$ and shows the weak convergence of iterates. The local error bound condition is extremely useful in analyzing the convergence rates of a host of iterative methods for solving optimization problems, and in practical application, a large number of problems with special structure often satisfy the error bound condition. Naturally, using local error bound condition to derive or improve the convergence rate of IFB is a common means. In this paper, based on the local error bound condition, we exploit an new assumption condition for the important parameter $t_k$ in IFB, and establish the improved convergence rate of function values and strong convergence of the iterates generated by the IFB algorithms with six $t_k$ satisfying the above assumption condition in Hilbert space. It is remarkable that, under the local error bound condition, we establish the strong convergence of the iterates generated by the original FISTA, and prove that the convergence rates of function values for FISTA\_CD is actually related to the value of parameter $a,$ and show that the IFB algorithms with some $t_k$ mentioned above can achieve sublinear convergence rate $o\left( {\frac{1}{k^p}} \right)$ for any positive integer $p>1$. Some numerical experiments are conducted to illustrate our results.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.