Paper detail

Convergence Rate Bounds for the Mirror Descent Method: IQCs and the Bregman Divergence

This paper is concerned with convergence analysis for the mirror descent (MD) method, a well-known algorithm in convex optimization. An analysis framework via integral quadratic constraints (IQCs) is constructed to analyze the convergence rate of the MD method with strongly convex objective functions in both continuous-time and discrete-time. We formulate the problem of finding convergence rates of the MD algorithms into feasibility problems of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) in both schemes. In particular, in continuous-time, we show that the Bregman divergence function, which is commonly used as a Lyapunov function for this algorithm, is a special case of the class of Lyapunov functions associated with the Popov criterion, when the latter is applied to an appropriate reformulation of the problem. Thus, applying the Popov criterion and its combination with other IQCs, can lead to convergence rate bounds with reduced conservatism. We also illustrate via examples that the convergence rate bounds derived can be tight.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.