Paper detail

Convergence of Optimal Expected Utility for a Sequence of Binomial Models

We analyze the convergence of expected utility under the approximation of the Black-Scholes model by binomial models. In a recent paper by D. Kreps and W. Schachermayer a surprising and somewhat counter-intuitive example was given: such a convergence may, in general, fail to hold true. This counterexample is based on a binomial model where the i.i.d. logarithmic one-step increments have strictly positive third moments. This is the case, when the up-tick of the log-price is larger than the down-tick. In the paper by D. Kreps and W. Schachermayer it was left as an open question how things behave in the case when the down-tick is larger than the up-tick and -- most importantly -- in the case of the symmetric binomial model where the up-tick equals the down-tick. Is there a general positive result of convergence of expected utility in this setting? In the present note we provide a positive answer to this question. It is based on some rather fine estimates of the convergence arising in the Central Limit Theorem.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.