Paper detail

Convergence and error estimates for time-discrete consensus-based optimization algorithms

We present convergence and error estimates of the time-discrete consensus-based optimization(CBO) algorithms proposed in [arXiv:1909.09249] for general nonconvex functions. In authors' recent work [arxiv: 1910.08239], rigorous error analysis of the first-order consensus-based optimization algorithm proposed in [arXiv:1909.09249] was studied at the particle level without resorting to the kinetic equation via a mean-field limit. However, the error analysis for the corresponding time-discrete algorithm was not done mainly due to lack of discrete analogue of Itô's stochastic calculus. In this paper, we provide a simple and elementary convergence and error analysis for a general time-discrete consensus-based optimization algorithm, which includes the three discrete algorithms in [arXiv:1909.09249]. Our analysis provides numerical stability and convergence conditions for the three algorithms, as well as error estimates to the global minimum.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.