Paper detail

Convergence Analysis of the Relaxed Douglas-Rachford Algorithm

Motivated by nonconvex, inconsistent feasibility problems in imaging, the relaxed alternating averaged reflections algorithm, or relaxed Douglas-Rachford algorithm (DR$λ$), was first proposed over a decade ago. Convergence results for this algorithm are limited either to convex feasibility or consistent nonconvex feasibility with strong assumptions on the regularity of the underlying sets. Using an analytical framework depending only on metric subregularity and pointwise almost averagedness, we analyze the convergence behavior of DR$λ$ for feasibility problems that are both nonconvex and inconsistent. We introduce a new type of regularity of sets, called super-regular at a distance, to establish sufficient conditions for local linear convergence of the corresponding sequence. These results subsume and extend existing results for this algorithm.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.