Paper detail

Convergence Analysis of Generalized ADMM with Majorization for Linearly Constrained Composite Convex Optimization

The generalized alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) of Xiao et al. [{\tt Math. Prog. Comput., 2018}] aims at the two-block linearly constrained composite convex programming problem, in which each block is in the form of "nonsmooth + quadratic". However, in the case of non-quadratic (but smooth), this method may fail unless the favorable structure of 'nonsmooth + smooth' is no longer used. This paper aims to remedy this defect by using a majorized technique to approximate the augmented Lagrangian function, so that the corresponding subprobllem can be decomposed into some smaller problems and then solved separately. Furthermore, the recent symmetric Gauss-Seidel (sGS) decomposition theorem guarantees the equivalence between the bigger subproblem and these smaller ones. This paper focuses on convergence analysis, that is, we prove that the sequence generated by the proposed method converges globally to a Karush-Kuhn-Tucker point of the considered problem. Finally, we do some numerical experiments on a kind of simulated convex composite optimization problems which illustrate that the proposed method is more efficient than its compared ones.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.