Paper detail

Convergence analysis of a numerical scheme for a tumour growth model

We consider a one--spatial dimensional tumour growth model [2, 3, 4] that consists of three dependent variables of space and time: volume fraction of tumour cells, velocity of tumour cells, and nutrient concentration. The model variables satisfy a coupled system of semilinear advection equation (hyperbolic), simplified linear Stokes equation (elliptic), and semilinear diffusion equation (parabolic) with appropriate conditions on the time-dependent boundary, which is governed by an ordinary differential equation. We employ a reformulation of the model defined in a larger, fixed time-space domain to overcome some theoretical difficulties related to the time-dependent boundary. This reformulation reduces the complexity of the model by removing the need to explicitly track the time-dependent boundary, but nonlinearities in the equations, noncoercive operators in the simplified Stokes equation, and interdependence between the unknown variables still challenge the proof of suitable a priori estimates. A numerical scheme that employs a finite volume method for the hyperbolic equation, a finite element method for the elliptic equation, and a backward Euler in time--mass lumped finite element in space method for the parabolic equation is developed. We establish the existence of a time interval $(0,T_{\ast})$ over which, using compactness techniques, we can extract a convergent subsequence of the numerical approximations. The limit of any such convergent subsequence is proved to be a weak solution of the continuous model in an appropriate sense, which we call a threshold solution. Numerical tests and justifications that confirm the theoretical findings conclude the paper.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.