Paper detail

Conventional superconductivity and hysteretic Campbell penetration depth in single crystals MgCNi$_3$

Single crystals of MgCNi$_3$, with areas sized up to 1 mm$^{2}$, were grown by the self flux method using a cubic anvil high pressure technique. The first critical field \textit{H$_{c1}$}, determined from a zero temperature extrapolation, is around 18 mT. Using the tunnel - diode resonator technique, the London penetration depth was measured with no applied \textit{dc} field and the Campbell penetration depth was measured with the external \textit{dc} fields up to 9T for two different sample orientations with respect to the direction of applied magnetic field. The absolute value of the London penetration depth, $λ(0) = 245 \pm 10$ nm was determined from the thermodynamic Rutgers formula. The superfluid density, $ρ_s=(λ(0)/λ(T))^2$ was found to follow the clean isotropic \textit{s}-wave behavior predicted by the weak - coupling BCS theory in the whole temperature range. The low - temperature behavior of the London penetration depth fits the BCS analytic form as well and produces close to the weak - coupling value of $Δ(0)/k_BT_c = 1.71$. The temperature dependence of the upper critical field, \textit{$H_{c2}$}, was found to be isotropic with a slope at \textit{T$_c$} of -2.63 T/K and \textit{H$_{c2}$}(0) $\approx$ 12.3 T at zero temperature. The Campbell penetration depth probes the vortex lattice response in the mixed state and is sensitive to the details of the pinning potential. For MgCNi$_3$, an irreversible feature has been observed in the TDR response when the sample is field-cooled and warmed versus zero-field-cooled and warmed. This feature possesses a non-monotonic field dependence and has commonly been referred to as the peak effect and is most likely related to a field - dependent non - parabolic pinning potential.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.