Paper detail

Convective dynamics with mixed temperature boundary conditions: why thermal relaxation matters and how to accelerate it

Astrophysical simulations of convection frequently impose different thermal boundary conditions at the top and the bottom of the domain in an effort to more accurately model natural systems. In this work, we study Rayleigh-Benard convection (RBC) under the Boussinesq approximation. We examine simulations with mixed temperature boundary conditions in which the flux is fixed at the bottom boundary and the temperature is fixed at the top ("FT"). We aim to understand how FT boundaries change the nature of the convective solution compared to the traditional choice of thermal boundaries, in which the temperature is fixed at the top and bottom of the domain ("TT"). We demonstrate that the timescale of thermal relaxation for FT simulations is dependent upon the initial conditions. "Classic" initial conditions which employ a hydrostatically -- and thermally -- balanced linear temperature profile exhibit a long thermal relaxation. This long relaxation is not seen in FT simulations which use a TT simulation's nonlinear state as initial conditions ("TT-to-FT"). In the thermally relaxed, statistically stationary state, the mean behavior of an FT simulation corresponds to an equivalent simulation with TT boundaries, and time- and volume-averaged flow statistics like the Nusselt number and the Peclet number are indistinguishable between FT and TT simulations. FT boundaries are fundamentally asymmetric, and we examine the asymmetries that these boundaries produce in the flow. We find that the fixed-flux boundary produces more extreme temperature events than the fixed-temperature boundary. However, these near-boundary asymmetries do not measurably break the symmetry in the convective interior. We briefly explore rotating RBC to demonstrate that our findings with respect to thermal relaxation carry over to this more complex case, and to show the power of TT-to-FT initial conditions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.