Paper detail

Convective dissolution of CO$_2$ in 2D and 3D porous media: the impact of hydrodynamic dispersion

Convective dissolution is the process by which CO$_2$ injected in deep geological formations dissolves into the aqueous phase, which allows storing it perennially by gravity. The process results from buoyancy-coupled Darcy flow and solute transport. Proper theoretical modeling of the process should consider in the transport equation a diffusive term accounting for hydrodynamics (or, mechanical) dispersion, with an effective diffusion coefficient that is proportional to the local interstitial velocity. A few two-dimensional (2D) numerical studies, and three-dimensional (3D) experimental investigations, have investigated the impact of hydrodynamic dispersion on convection dynamics, with contradictory conclusions. Here, we investigate systematically the impact of the dispersion strength $S$ (relative to molecular diffusion), and of the anisotropy $α$ of its tensor, on convective dissolution in 2D and 3D geometries. We use a new numerical model and analyze the solute fingers' number density (FND), penetration depth and maximum velocity; the onset time of convection; the dissolution flux in the quasi-constant flux regime; the mean concentration of the dissolved CO2; and the scalar dissipation rate. The efficiency of convective dissolution over long times is observed to be mostly controlled by the onset time of convection. For most natural porous media ($α= 0.1$), the onset time is found to increase as a function of $S$, in agreement with previous experimental findings and in stark contrast to previous numerical findings. However, if $α$ is sufficiently large this behavior is reversed. Furthermore, results in 3D are fully consistent with the 2D results on all accounts, except that in 3D the onset time is slightly smaller, the dissolution flux in the quasi-constant flux regime is slightly larger, and the dependence of the FND on the dispersion parameters is impacted by $Ra$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.