Paper detail

Convective cooling and fragmentation of gravitationally unstable disks

Gravitationally unstable disks can fragment and form bound objects provided that their cooling time is short. In protoplanetary disks radiative cooling is likely to be too slow to permit formation of planets by fragmentation within several tens of AU from the star. Recently, convection has been suggested as a faster means of heat loss from the disk but here we demonstrate that it is only marginally more efficient than the radiative cooling. The crucial factor is the rate at which energy can be radiated from the disk photosphere, which is robustly limited from above in the convective case by the adiabatic temperature gradient (given a certain midplane temperature). Thus, although vigorous convection is definitely possible in disks, the inefficiency of radiative loss from the photosphere may create a bottleneck limiting the ability of the disk to form self-gravitating objects. Based on this argument we derive a set of analytical constraints which diagnose the susceptibility of an unstable disk to fragmentation and show that the formation of giant planets by fragmentation of protoplanetary disks is unlikely to occur at distances of tens of AU. At the same time these constraints do not preclude the possibility of fragmentation and star formation in accretion disks around supermassive black holes.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.