Paper detail

Controlling intrinsic-shear alignment in three-point weak lensing statistics

Three-point weak lensing statistics provide cosmic information complementary to that of two-point statistics. However, both statistics suffer from intrinsic-shear alignment, which is one of their limiting systematics. The nulling technique is a model-independent method developed to eliminate intrinsic-shear alignment at the two-point level. In this paper we demonstrate that the nulling technique can also be naturally generalized to the three-point level, controlling the corresponding GGI systematics. We show that under the assumption of exact redshift information the intrinsic-shear alignment contamination can be completely eliminated. To show how well the nulling technique performs on data with limited redshift information, we apply the nulling technique to three-point weak lensing statistics from a fictitious survey analogous to a typical future deep imaging survey, in which the three-point intrinsic-shear alignment systematics is generated from a power-law toy model. Using 10 redshift bins, the nulling technique leads to a factor of 10 suppression of the GGI/GGG ratio, and reduces the bias on cosmological parameters to less than the original statistical error. More detailed redshift information allowing for finer redshift bins leads to better reduction of bias. The information loss during the nulling procedure doubles the statistical error on cosmological parameters. A comparison of the nulling technique with an unconditioned compression of the data suggests that part of the information loss can be retained by considering higher-order nulling weights during the nulling procedure. A combined analysis of two- and three-point statistics confirms that the information contained in them is of comparable size and is complementary to each other, both before and after nulling.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.