Paper detail

Controlling anisotropy in 2D microscopic models of growth

The quantitative knowledge of interface anisotropy in lattice models is a major issue, both for the parametrization of continuum interface models, and for the analysis of experimental observations. In this paper, we focus on the anisotropy of line tension and stiffness, which plays a major role both in equilibrium shapes and fluctuations, and in the selection of nonequilibrium growth patterns. We consider a 2D Ising Hamiltonian on a square lattice with first and second-nearest-neighbor interactions. The surface stiffness and line tension are calculated by means of a broken-bond model for arbitrary orientations. The analysis of the interface energy allows us to determine the conditions under which stiffness anisotropy is minimal. These results are supported by a quantitative comparison with kinetic Monte Carlo simulations, based on the coupling of a field of mobile atoms to a condensed phase. Furthermore, we introduce a generic smoothing parameter which allows one to mimic the finite resolution of experimental microscopy techniques. Our results provide a method to fine-tune the interface energy in models of nanoscale non-equilibrium processes, where anisotropy and fluctuations combine and give rise to non-trivial morphologies.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.