Paper detail

Control of large 1D networks of double integrator agents: role of heterogeneity and asymmetry on stability margin

We consider the distributed control of a network of heterogeneous agents with double integrator dynamics to maintain a rigid formation in 1D Euclidean space. The control signal at a vehicle is allowed to use relative position and velocity with its two nearest neighbors. Most of the work on this problem, though extensive, has been limited to homogeneous networks, in which agents have identical masses and control gains, and symmetric control, in which information from front and back neighbors are weighted equally. We examine the effect of heterogeneity and asymmetry on the closed loop stability margin, which is measured by the real part of the least stable pole of the closed-loop system. By using a PDE (partial differential equation) approximation in the limit of large number of vehicles, we show that heterogeneity has little effect while asymmetry has a significant effect on the stability margin. When control is symmetric, the stability margin decays to 0 as $O(1/N^2)$, where $N$ is the number of agents, even when the agents are heterogeneous in their masses and control gains. In contrast, we show that arbitrarily small amount of asymmetry in the velocity feedback gains can improve the decay of the stability margin to $O(1/N)$. Poor design of such asymmetry makes the closed loop unstable for sufficiently large $N$. With equal amount of asymmetry in both position and velocity feedback gains, the closed loop is stable for arbitrary $N$ and the stability margin scaling trend can also be improved to $O(1/N)$, but the sensitivity to disturbance becomes worse. Effect of asymmetry in position feedback gains alone and unequal amount of asymmetry in position and velocity feedback are open problems. Numerical computations are provided to corroborate the analysis.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.