Paper detail

Control of human immune response function by T-cell population fluctuation and relaxation dynamics

Clinical studies have indicated that in malignant surveillances fluctuations in the population of certain effector T-cell repertoire become suppressed. Motivated by such observations and in an attempt to quantify adaptive human response to pathogens, we define an immune response function (IMRF) in terms of mean square fluctuations of T-cell concentrations. We employ a recently developed kinetic model of T-cell regulation that contains the essential immunosuppressive effects of vitamin-D. We employ Gillespie algorithm to make the first study of fluctuations along the stochastic trajectories. This fluctuation-based IMRF can differentiate responses of different individuals after pathogenic incursion both under healthy and disease conditions. We find that relative fluctuations in T-cells (and hence IMRF) are different in strongly regulated (malignant prone) and weakly regulated (autoimmune prone) regions. The cross-over from one steady state (weakly regulated) to the other (strongly regulated) is accompanied by a divergence-like growth in the fluctuation of both the effector and regulatory T-cell concentration over a wide range of pathogenic stimulation, displaying a dynamical phase transition like behavior. The growth in fluctuation in this desired immune response regime is found to arise from an intermittent fluctuation between regulatory and effector T-cells that results in a bimodal distribution of population of each, indicating bistability. The signature of intermittent behavior is further confirmed by calculating the power spectrum of the corresponding fluctuation of time correlation function. The calculated time correlation functions of fluctuations show that the slow fluctuation causes the bistabilty in healthy state. Thus, in diseases diagnosis process, such steady state response parameters can provide immense information which might become helpful to define an immune status.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.