Paper detail

Contribution of Two-Boson-Exchange with $Δ(1232)$ Excitation to Parity-Violating Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering

We study the leading electroweak corrections in the precision measurement of the strange form factors. Specifically, we calculate the two-boson-exchange (TBE), two-photon-exchange (TPE) plus $γZ$-exchange ($γZ$E), corrections with $Δ(1232)$ excitation to the parity-violating asymmetry of the elastic electron-proton scattering. The interplay between nucleon and $Δ$ contributions is found to depend strongly on the kinematics, as $δ_Δ$ begins as negligible at backward angles but becomes very large and negative and dominant at forward angles, while $δ_N$ always stays positive and decreases monotonically with increasing $ε$. The total TBE corrections to the extracted values of $G^{s}_{E}+βG^{s}_{M}$ in recent experiments of HAPPEX and G0 are, depending on kinematics, found to be large and range between 13% to -75% but small in the case of A4 experiments.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.