Paper detail

Contribution of the charm quark to the ΔI=1/2 rule

We report on the progress of our ongoing project to quantify the role of the charm quark in the non-leptonic decay of a kaon into two pions. The effect of its associated mass scale in the dynamics underlying the ΔI = 1/2 rule can be studied by monitoring the dependence of kaon decay amplitudes on the charm quark mass using an effective ΔS = 1 weak Hamiltonian. In contrast to commonly used approaches the charm quark is kept as an active degree of freedom. Quenched results in the GIM limit have shown that a significant part of the ΔI = 1/2 enhancement is purely due to low-energy QCD effects. Moving away from the GIM limit involves the computation of diagrams containing closed quark loops which requires new variance reduction techniques in order to determine the relevant weak effective low-energy couplings. We employ a combination of low-mode averaging and stochastic volume sources in order to compute these diagrams and observe a significant improvement in the statistical signal.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.