Paper detail

Contribution of the aging effect to the observed asymmetry of interplanetary magnetic clouds

Large magnetic structures are launched away from the Sun during solar eruptions. They are observed as (interplanetary) coronal mass ejections (ICMEs or CMEs) with coronal and heliospheric imagers. A fraction of them are observed insitu as magnetic clouds (MCs). Fitting these structures properly with a model requires a better understanding of their evolution. In situ measurements are done locally when the spacecraft trajectory crosses the magnetic configuration. These observations are taken for different elements of plasma and at different times, and are therefore biased by the expansion of the magnetic configuration. This aging effect leads to stronger magnetic fields measured at the front than at the rear of MCs, an asymmetry often present in MC data. However, can the observed asymmetry be explained quantitatively only from the expansion? Based on self-similar expansion, we derive a method to estimate the expansion rate from observed plasma velocity. We next correct for the aging effect both the observed magnetic field and the spatial coordinate along the spacecraft trajectory. This provides corrected data as if the MC internal structure was observed at the same time. We apply the method to 90 best observed MCs near Earth (1995-2012). The aging effect is the main source of the observed magnetic asymmetry only for 28\% of MCs. After correcting the aging effect, the asymmetry is almost symmetrically distributed between MCs with a stronger magnetic field at the front and those at the rear of MCs. The proposed method can efficiently remove the aging bias within insitu data of MCs, and more generally of ICMEs. This allows one to analyse the data with a spatial coordinate, such as in models or remote sensing observations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.