Paper detail

Contrasting Analog and Digital Resistive Switching Memory Characteristics in Solution-Processed Copper (I) Thiocyanate and Its Polymer Electrolyte Based Memristive Devices

Usually, resistive switching (RS) devices show digital RS memory (sharp SET and RESET process), which is most suitable for digital data storage applications. Some RS devices also manifest ideal memristive behavior or analog memory characteristics (gradual change in resistance states). The analog RS properties of memristive devices widen their application domain to a much broader field of neuromorphic computing. The tunability of memristive devices to digital or analog memory applications greatly depends upon the switching medium. In this work, we report a comparative study on RS properties of two kinds of memristive devices based upon copper (I) thiocyanate (CuSCN) and a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) made up of CuSCN as ionic moieties in polyethylene oxide (PEO). The device (ITO/CuSCN/Cu), prepared by spin-coating CuSCN layer between ITO and copper electrode, shows simultaneous analog and digital RS characteristics. The RS property of the device is tunable by varying the thickness of the CuSCN layer. The current-voltage characteristics reveal that devices prepared at 3000 rpm (thicker) during the spin-coating show only digital bipolar RS memory. In comparison, the devices deposited at 4000 rpm (thinner) show both analog and digital RS memory. The conduction mechanism responsible for RS behavior in CuSCN-based devices is Schottky emission mediated charge trapping and de-trapping at the interfacial states. Contrastingly, when the same CuSCN is used as the electrolyte in SPE film, the device only shows bipolar digital non-volatile memory characteristics. The RS behavior is due to the electrochemical metallization (ECM) mechanism. The ON and OFF states are achieved by the formation and rupture of copper filaments due to the redox reactions at the interface.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.