Paper detail

Continuum limit of critical inhomogeneous random graphs

Motivated by applications, the last few years have witnessed tremendous interest in understanding the structure as well as the behavior of dynamics for inhomogeneous random graph models. In this study we analyze the maximal components at criticality of one famous class of such models, the rank-one inhomogeneous random graph model. Viewing these components as measured random metric spaces, under finite moment assumptions for the weight distribution, we show that the components in the critical scaling window with distances scaled by $n^{-1/3}$ converge in the Gromov-Haussdorf-Prokhorov metric to rescaled versions of the limit objects identified for the Erdős-Rényi random graph components at criticality Addario-Berry, Broutin and Goldschmidt (2012). A key step is the construction of connected components of the random graph through an appropriate tilt of a famous class of random trees called $\mathbf{p}$-trees (studied previously by Aldous, Miermont and Pitman (2004) and by Camarri and Pitman (2000)). This is the first step in rigorously understanding the scaling limits of objects such as the Minimal spanning tree and other strong disorder models from statistical physics (see Braunstein et al., 2003) for such graph models. By asymptotic equivalence (Janson, 2010), the same results are true for the Chung-Lu model and the Britton-Deijfen-Lof model. A crucial ingredient of the proof of independent interest is tail bounds for the height of $\mathbf{p}$-trees. The techniques developed in this paper form the main technical bedrock for proving continuum scaling limits in the critical regime for a wide array of other random graph models (Bhamidi, Broutin, Sen and Wang, 2014) including the configuration model and inhomogeneous random graphs with general kernels which were introduced by Bollobas, Janson and Riordan (2007).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.