Paper detail

Continuum and discrete models for unbalanced woven fabrics

The classical models used for describing the behavior of woven fabrics do not fully account for the whole set of phenomena that occur during the testing of such materials. This lack of precision is mainly due to the absence of energy terms related to the microstructural properties of the fabric and, in particular, to the bending stiffness of the yarns. In this paper it is shown that in the unbalanced fabrics the different bending stiffnesses of the warp and weft yarns produce macroscopic effects that are extremely visible as, for example, the asymmetric S-shape during a Bias Extension Test (BET). We propose to introduce a constrained micromorphic model and a discrete model that are able to account for i) the angle variation between warp and weft tows, ii) the unbalance in the bending stiffness of the yarns and iii) the relative slipping of the tows. The constrained micromorphic model is framed in the spirit of the Principle of Virtual Powers for the equilibrium of continuum bodies. A suitable constraint is introduced by means of Lagrange multipliers in the strain energydens ity and the resulting constrained model tends a particular second gradientone. The main advantage of using such constrained micromorphic model is that the kinematical and traction boundary conditions that can be imposed on the boundary of the considered body take a natural and unique meaning. The discrete model is set up by opportunely interconnecting Euler-Bernoulli beams with different bending stiffnesses in the two directions by means of rotational and translational elastic springs. The main advantage of such discrete model is that the slipping of the tows is described in a rather realistic way. Suitable numerical simulations are presented for both the continuum and the discrete models and a comparison between the simulations and the experimental results is made showing a definitely good agreement.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.