Paper detail

Continuous self-similarity in parametric piecewise isometries

We exhibit two distinct renormalization scenarios in many-parameter families of piecewise isometries (PWI) of a rhombus. The rotational component, defined over the quadratic field $\mathbb{K}=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5})$, is fixed. The translations are specified by affine functions of the parameters, with coefficients in $\mathbb{K}$. In each case the parameters range over a convex domain. In one scenario the PWI is self-similar if and only if one parameter belongs to $\mathbb{K}$, while the other is free. Such a continuous self-similarity is due to the possibility of merging adjacent atoms of an induced PWI, a common phenomenon in the Rauzy-Veech induction for interval exchange transformations. In the second scenario, the phase space splits into several disjoint (non-convex) invariant components. We show that each component has continuous self-similarity, but due to the transversality of the corresponding foliations, full self-similarity in phase space is achieved if and only if both parameters belong to $\mathbb{K}$. All our computations are exact, using algebraic numbers.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.