Paper detail

Continuous quantum phase transition in the fermionic mass solutions of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model

Recently quantum simulators have been constructed to investigate experimentally the most prominent theoretical four-point many-body system described by the Hubbard model. By varying the coupling strength of the four-point interaction in relation to the kinetic term, one can analyze the phase structure of the model. This intriguing fact leads us to investigate whether similar Hamiltonians with four-point interactions can also be studied as a function of their four-point coupling strength. In this paper, we reexamine the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model, regarding it generally beyond the context of quantum chromodynamics. Essentially, it is a model in which particle-antiparticle pairing leads to a BCS-like condensate, with the result that chiral symmetry is broken dynamically in the strong-coupling regime. To study the behavior of the system, it is necessary to move from this regime to a hypothetical regime of weak coupling, altering the coupling strength of the interaction arbitrarily. In order to do this, the gap equation must be regarded as complex and its Riemann surface structure must be known. We do this and obtain a continuous quantum phase transition characterized by the development of a complex order parameter (the dynamically generated mass) from the second sheet of the Riemann surface, as we move into the weak-coupling regime. The power-law behavior of the order parameter in the vicinity of the phase transition point is demonstrated to be independent of the choice of the regularization scheme with the critical exponent as $β\approx 0.55$. At the same time, the isovector pseudoscalar modes retain their feature as Goldstone modes and still have zero mass, while the isoscalar scalar meson follows the behavior of the order parameter and gains a width. Energetically, this mode is not favored over the normal, uncondensed mode but would have to be accessed through an excitation process.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.