Paper detail

Continuous higher randomness

We investigate the role of continuous reductions and continuous relativisation in the context of higher randomness. We define a higher analogue of Turing reducibility and show that it interacts well with higher randomness, for example with respect to van-Lambalgen's theorem and the Miller-Yu / Levin theorem. We study lowness for continuous relativization of randomness, and show the equivalence of the higher analogues of the different characterisations of lowness for Martin-Löf randomness. We also characterise computing higher $K$-trivial sets by higher random sequences. We give a separation between higher notions of randomness, in particular between higher weak-2-randomness and $Π^1_1$-randomness. To do so we investigate classes of functions computable from Kleene's~$O$ based on strong forms of the higher limit lemma.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.