Paper detail

Continuos particles in the Canonical Ensemble as an abstract polymer gas

We revisit the expansion recently proposed by Pulvirenti and Tsagkarogiannis for a system of $N$ continuous particles in the canonical ensemble. Under the sole assumption that the particles interact via a tempered and stable pair potential and are subjected to the usual free boundary conditions, we show the analyticity of the Helmholtz free energy at low densities and, using the Penrose tree graph identity, we establish a lower bound for the convergence radius which happens to be identical to the lower bound of the convergence radius of the virial series in the grand canonical ensemble established by Lebowitz and Penrose in 1964. We also show that the (Helmholtz) free energy can be written as a series in power of the density whose $k$ order coefficient coincides, modulo terms $o(N)/N$, with the $k$-order virial coefficient divided by $k+1$, according to its expression in terms of the $m$-order (with $m\le k+1$) simply connected cluster integrals first given by Mayer in 1942. We finally give an upper bound for the $k$-order virial coefficient which slightly improves, at high temperatures, the bound obtained by Lebowitz and Penrose.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.