Paper detail

Contiguous redshift parameterizations of the growth index

The growth rate of matter perturbations can be used to distinguish between different gravity theories and to distinguish between dark energy and modified gravity at cosmological scales as an explanation to the observed cosmic acceleration. We suggest here parameterizations of the growth index as functions of the redshift. The first one is given by $γ(a)=\tildeγ(a) \frac{1}{1+(a_{_{ttc}}/a)}+γ_{_{early}} \frac{1}{1+(a/a_{_{ttc}})}$ that interpolates between a low/intermediate redshift parameterization $\tildeγ(a)=γ_{_{late}}(a)= γ_0 + (1-a) γ_a$ and a high redshift $γ_{_{early}}$ constant value. For example, our interpolated form $γ(a)$ can be used when including the CMB to the rest of the data while the form $γ_{_{late}}(a)$ can be used otherwise. It is found that the parameterizations proposed achieve a fit that is better than 0.004% for the growth rate in a $Λ$CDM model, better than 0.014% for Quintessence-Cold-Dark-Matter (QCDM) models, and better than 0.04% for the flat Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (DGP) model (with $Ω_m^0=0.27$) for the entire redshift range up to $z_{_{CMB}}$. We find that the growth index parameters $(γ_0,γ_a)$ take distinctive values for dark energy models and modified gravity models, e.g. $(0.5655,-0.02718)$ for the $Λ$CDM model and $(0.6418,0.06261)$ for the flat DGP model. This provides a means for future observational data to distinguish between the models.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.