Paper detail

Context-aware Reranking with Utility Maximization for Recommendation

As a critical task for large-scale commercial recommender systems, reranking has shown the potential of improving recommendation results by uncovering mutual influence among items. Reranking rearranges items in the initial ranking lists from the previous ranking stage to better meet users' demands. However, rather than considering the context of initial lists as most existing methods do, an ideal reranking algorithm should consider the counterfactual context -- the position and the alignment of the items in the reranked lists. In this work, we propose a novel pairwise reranking framework, Context-aware Reranking with Utility Maximization for recommendation (CRUM), which maximizes the overall utility after reranking efficiently. Specifically, we first design a utility-oriented evaluator, which applies Bi-LSTM and graph attention mechanism to estimate the listwise utility via the counterfactual context modeling. Then, under the guidance of the evaluator, we propose a pairwise reranker model to find the most suitable position for each item by swapping misplaced item pairs. Extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets and a proprietary real-world dataset demonstrate that CRUM significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art models in terms of both relevance-based metrics and utility-based metrics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.