Paper detail

Constructive Feedback of Non-Markovianity on Resources in Random Quantum States

We explore the impact of non-Markovian channels on the quantum correlations (QCs) of Haar uniformly generated random two-qubit input states with different ranks -- either one of the qubits (single-sided) or both the qubits independently (double-sided) are passed through noisy channels. Under dephasing and depolarizing channels with varying non-Markovian strength, entanglement and quantum discord of the output states collapse and revive with the increase of noise. We find that in case of the depolarizing double-sided channel, both the QCs of random states show a higher number of revivals on average than that of the single-sided ones with a fixed non-Markovianity strength, irrespective of the rank of the states -- we call such a counter-intuitive event as a constructive feedback of non-Markovianity. Consequently, the average noise at which QCs of random states show first revival decreases with the increase of the strength of non-Markovian noise, thereby indicating the role of non-Markovian channels on the regenerations of QCs even in presence of a high amount of noise. However, we observe that non-Markovianity does not play any role to increase the robustness in random quantum states which can be measured by the mean value of critical noise at which quantum correlations first collapse. Moreover, we observe that the tendency of a state to show regeneration increases with the increase of average QCs of the random input states along with non-Markovianity.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.