Paper detail

Constructions of Optical Queues With a Limited Number of Recirculations--Part I: Greedy Constructions

In this two-part paper, we consider SDL constructions of optical queues with a limited number of recirculations through the optical switches and the fiber delay lines. We show that the constructions of certain types of optical queues, including linear compressors, linear decompressors, and 2-to-1 FIFO multiplexers, under a simple packet routing scheme and under the constraint of a limited number of recirculations can be transformed into equivalent integer representation problems under a corresponding constraint. Given $M$ and $k$, the problem of finding an \emph{optimal} construction, in the sense of maximizing the maximum delay (resp., buffer size), among our constructions of linear compressors/decompressors (resp., 2-to-1 FIFO multiplexers) is equivalent to the problem of finding an optimal sequence ${\dbf^*}_1^M$ in $\Acal_M$ (resp., $\Bcal_M$) such that $B({\dbf^*}_1^M;k)=\max_{\dbf_1^M\in \Acal_M}B(\dbf_1^M;k)$ (resp., $B({\dbf^*}_1^M;k)=\max_{\dbf_1^M\in \Bcal_M}B(\dbf_1^M;k)$), where $\Acal_M$ (resp., $\Bcal_M$) is the set of all sequences of fiber delays allowed in our constructions of linear compressors/decompressors (resp., 2-to-1 FIFO multiplexers). In Part I, we propose a class of \emph{greedy} constructions of linear compressors/decompressors and 2-to-1 FIFO multiplexers by specifying a class $\Gcal_{M,k}$ of sequences such that $\Gcal_{M,k}\subseteq \Bcal_M\subseteq \Acal_M$ and each sequence in $\Gcal_{M,k}$ is obtained recursively in a greedy manner. We then show that every optimal construction must be a greedy construction. In Part II, we further show that there are at most two optimal constructions and give a simple algorithm to obtain the optimal construction(s).

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.