Paper detail

Constructing sparse Davenport-Schinzel sequences

For any sequence $u$, the extremal function $Ex(u, j, n)$ is the maximum possible length of a $j$-sparse sequence with $n$ distinct letters that avoids $u$. We prove that if $u$ is an alternating sequence $a b a b \dots$ of length $s$, then $Ex(u, j, n) = Θ(s n^{2})$ for all $j \geq 2$ and $s \geq n$, answering a question of Wellman and Pettie [Lower Bounds on Davenport-Schinzel Sequences via Rectangular Zarankiewicz Matrices, Disc. Math. 341 (2018), 1987--1993] and extending the result of Roselle and Stanton that $Ex(u, 2, n) = Θ(s n^2)$ for any alternation $u$ of length $s \geq n$ [Some properties of Davenport-Schinzel sequences, Acta Arithmetica 17 (1971), 355--362]. Wellman and Pettie also asked how large must $s(n)$ be for there to exist $n$-block $DS(n, s(n))$ sequences of length $Ω(n^{2-o(1)})$. We answer this question by showing that the maximum possible length of an $n$-block $DS(n, s(n))$ sequence is $Ω(n^{2-o(1)})$ if and only if $s(n) = Ω(n^{1-o(1)})$. We also show related results for extremal functions of forbidden 0-1 matrices with any constant number of rows and extremal functions of forbidden sequences with any constant number of distinct letters.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.