Paper detail

Constricted SUSY from No-Scale F-SU(5): A "Blind Spot" for LHC Top Quark Reconstruction?

We describe a region of the No-Scale F-SU(5) supersymmetric model with TeV-scale vector-like matter multiplets that is potentially opaque to LHC observations based upon top quark reconstruction. Possessing a 100% on-shell branching fraction for gluino to light stop decays, the gluino-light stop mass splitting in F-SU(5) lies very close to the top quark rest mass in the region 810 (650) <~ M(gluino) (M(light stop)) <~ 1170 (975) GeV. For unboosted gluino pair-production, this could render two soft top quarks in the dominant 4-top signature, greatly reducing the likelihood for discrimination from the combinatoric background. We therefore suggest that caution is warranted when gluino exclusion bounds on models possessing a similar spectral character (gluino heavier than the light stop but lighter than all other squarks) using multijet SUSY search tactics. Alternate search methods are highlighted, including those based upon same sign dileptons and multiple heavy flavor tags, which are more sensitive to this delicate kinematic "blind spot" crease.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.