Paper detail

Constraints onOmega from the IRAS Redshift Surveys

We measure the anisotropy of the redshift-space power spectrum in the 1.2-Jy and QDOT redshift surveys of IRAS-selected galaxies. On large scales, this anisotropy is caused by coherent peculiar motions, and gravitational instability theory predicts a distortion of the power spectrum that depends only on the ratio $β\equiv f(Ω)/b \approx Ω^{0.6}/b$, where Omega is the cosmological density parameter and $b$ is the bias parameter. On small scales, the distortion is dominated by the random velocity dispersion in non-linear structures. We fit the observed anisotropy with an analytic model that incorporates two parameters, beta, and a small-scale velocity dispersion sigma_v. Tests on N-body simulations show that this model recovers beta quite accurately on the scales accessible to the existing IRAS redshift surveys. Applying our procedure to the 1.2-Jy and QDOT surveys, we find beta=0.52 +/- 0.13 and beta=0.54 +/- 0.3, respectively. These results imply Omega approximately 0.35 if galaxies trace mass, or a bias factor of about 2 if Omega=1.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.