Paper detail

Constraints on viewing geometries from radio observations of $γ$-ray-loud pulsars using a novel method

We present radio intensity and polarisation profiles of 28 $γ$-ray-detected pulsars with the aim of putting constraints on their viewing geometries using data from the Parkes telescope. Constraints are formed both from the goodness-of-fit of the position angles to the Rotating Vector Model and from the beam opening angle considering aberration and retardation effects. Uncertainties on the relevant parameters are systematically taken into account in order to produce a more robust constraint, using a new approach. Surprisingly, we find that the distribution of the magnetic inclination angle ($α$) in this subset of pulsars peaks at low values, contrary to the predictions of $γ$-ray models. We find a lack of correlation between these and a set of $α$ values which were derived using $γ$-ray light curves, suggesting a problem in the interpretation of the data in one or both of these domains. Finally, we also show that the $α$ distribution of pulsars with multiple radio components is no different to that of single-component pulsars.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.