Paper detail

Constraints on the two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization

At low energies hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) is strongly dominated by two-pion intermediate states, which are responsible for about $70\%$ of the HVP contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, $a_μ^\text{HVP}$. Lattice-QCD evaluations of the latter indicate that it might be larger than calculated dispersively on the basis of $e^+e^-\to\text{hadrons}$ data, at a level which would contest the long-standing discrepancy with the $a_μ$ measurement. In this Letter we study to which extent this $2π$ contribution can be modified without, at the same time, producing a conflict elsewhere in low-energy hadron phenomenology. To this end we consider a dispersive representation of the $e^+e^- \to 2π$ process and study the correlations which thereby emerge between $a_μ^\text{HVP}$, the hadronic running of the fine-structure constant, the $P$-wave $ππ$ phase shift, and the charge radius of the pion. Inelastic effects play an important role, despite being constrained by the Eidelman-Lukaszuk bound. We identify scenarios in which $a_μ^\text{HVP}$ can be altered substantially, driven by changes in the phase shift and/or the inelastic contribution, and illustrate the ensuing changes in the $e^+e^-\to 2π$ cross section. In the combined scenario, which minimizes the effect in the cross section, a uniform shift around $4\%$ is required. At the same time both the analytic continuation into the space-like region and the pion charge radius are affected at a level that could be probed in future lattice-QCD calculations.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.