Paper detail

Constraints on the primordial gravitational waves with variable sound speed from current CMB data

We make a comprehensive investigation of the observational effect of the inflation consistency relation. We focus on the general single-field inflation model with the consistency relation $r=-8c_s n_t$, and investigate the observational constraints of sound speed $c_s$ by using the Seven-Year WMAP data, the BICEP tensor power spectrum data, and the constraints on $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm equil.}$ and $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm orth.}$ from the Five-Year WMAP observations. We find that the constraints on the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ is much tighter if $c_s$ is small, since a large tilt $n_t$ is strongly constrained by the observations. We obtain $r<0.37, 0.27$ and 0.09 ($dn_s/d\ln k=0$) for $c_s$=1, 0.1 and 0.01 models at 95.4% confidence level. When taking smaller values of $c_s$, the positive correlation between $r$ and $n_s$ also leads to slightly tighter constraint on the upper bound of $n_s$, while the running of scalar spectral index $dn_s/d\ln k$ is generally unaffected. For the sound speed $c_s$, it is not well constrained if only the CMB power spectrum data is used, while the constraints are obtainable by taking $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm equil.}$ and $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm orth.}$ priors into account. With the constraining data of $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm equil.}$ and $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm orth.}$, we find that, $c_s\lesssim 0.01$ region is excluded at 99.7% CL, and the $c_s=1$ case (the single-field slow-roll inflation) is slightly disfavored at 68.3% CL. In addition, the inclusion of $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm equil.}$ and $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm orth.}$ into the analysis can improve the constraints on $r$ and $n_s$. We further discuss the implications of our constraints on the test of inflation models.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.