Paper detail

Constraints on the Minor Merging and Star Formation History of the Wolf-Rayet Galaxy NGC 5430 Through Observations

We used multi-wavelength analysis of the newly observed molecular gas (12CO and 13CO (1-0)) with interferometer CARMA and archival star formation tracers to constrain the interaction, merging, and star formation history of an off-center minor merger, a three-spiral barred galaxy NGC 5430 and its satellite embedded in the bar. Morphology of the molecular gas in the bar of NGC 5430 shows minimal signs of recent interactions in our resolution. The apparent morphological remnant of the past galaxy interaction is an asymmetric spiral arm, containing more molecular gas and exhibiting higher star formation rate (SFR) surface density than the two primary arms. Rotation curve analysis suggests that NGC 5430 and its satellite collided several Gyr ago. History of star formation was constrained by using SFRs that trace different timescales (infrared, radio continuum, and H-alpha). The collision occurred 5 - 10 Myr ago, triggering a transient off-center starburst of Wolf-Rayet stars at the eastern bar end. In the past, the global SFR during the Wolf-Rayet starburst peaked at 35 Msun/yr. At present, the merger-driven starburst is rapidly decaying and the current global SFR has decreased to the Galactic value. The SFR will continue to decay as suggested by the present amount of dense gas (traced by HCN (1-0)). Nonetheless, the global SFR is still dominated by the Wolf-Rayet region rather than the circumnuclear region. Compared with other barred galaxies, the circumnuclear region exhibits particularly low dense gas fraction, low star formation activity and high concentration of gas. Physical properties of the molecular gas are inferred by using the large velocity gradient (LVG) calculations. The initial mass ratio of the NGC 5430 and its satellite are suggested to be in the intermediate ratio range of 7:1-20:1.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.