Paper detail

Constraints on the density distribution of type Ia supernovae ejecta inferred from late-time light-curve flattening

The finite time, $τ_{\rm dep}$, over which positrons from $β^{+}$ decays of $^{56}$Co deposit energy in type Ia supernovae ejecta lead, in case the positrons are trapped, to a slower decay of the bolometric luminosity compared to an exponential decline. Significant light-curve flattening is obtained when the ejecta density drops below the value for which $τ_{\rm dep}$ equals the $^{56}$Co life-time. We provide a simple method to accurately describe this "delayed deposition" effect, which is straightforward to use for analysis of observed light curves. We find that the ejecta heating is dominated by delayed deposition typically from 600 to 1200~day, and only later by longer lived isotopes $^{57}$Co and $^{55}$Fe decay (assuming solar abundance). For the relatively narrow $^{56}$Ni velocity distributions of commonly studied explosion models, the modification of the light curve depends mainly on the $^{56}$Ni mass-weighted average density, $\langle ρ\rangle t^{3}$. Accurate late-time bolometric light curves, which may be obtained with JWST far-infrared (far-IR) measurements, will thus enable to discriminate between explosion models by determining $\langle ρ\rangle t^3$ (and the $^{57}$Co and $^{55}$Fe abundances). The flattening of light curves inferred from recent observations, which is uncertain due to the lack of far-IR data, is readily explained by delayed deposition in models with $\langle ρ\rangle t^{3} \approx 0.2\,M_{\odot}\,(10^{4}\, \textrm{km}\,\textrm{s}^{-1})^{-3}$, and does not imply supersolar $^{57}$Co and $^{55}$Fe abundances.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.