Paper detail

Constraints on the chaotic inflationary scenario with a nonminimally coupled "inflaton" field from the cosmic microwave background radiation anisotropy

We investigate a possibility to restrict the chaotic inflationary scenario with "large" nonminimally coupled inflaton("phi") field considered by Fakir and Unruh by means of the observed CMBR anisotropy. We calculate the contributions of the long wavelength gravitational waves generated in the inflationary period to CMBR anisotropy quadrupole moment. We obtain the constraint lambda/(xi^2) = 1.8 X 10^(-8)/psi_i, where "lambda" is the self coupling, "xi" is the nonminimal coupling constant and "psi_i" means the initial value of psi = 8piG(phi^2). Combining this with previously obtained constraint that 2.1 times squre root of lambda/(xi^2) = dT/T = 1.1 X 10^(-5), we conclude that the initial value has to be psi_i = 1.6 X 10^3. If the self-coupling has a reasonably values of order 10^(-2), then xi = 10^4 and phi_i = 10^(-1) times Planck mass.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.