Paper detail

Constraints on star-formation driven galaxy winds from the mass-metallicity relation at z=0

We extend a chemical evolution model relating galaxy stellar mass and gas-phase oxygen abundance (the mass-metallicity relation) to explicitly consider the mass-dependence of galaxy gas fractions and outflows. Using empirically derived scalings of galaxy mass with halo virial velocity in conjunction with the most recent observations of z~0 total galaxy cold gas fractions and the mass-metallicity relation, we place stringent global constraints on the magnitude and scaling of the efficiency with which star forming galaxies expel metals. We demonstrate that under the assumptions that metal accretion is negligible and the stellar initial mass function does not vary, efficient outflows are required to reproduce the mass-metallicity relation; without winds, gas-to-stellar mass ratios >~ 0.3 dex higher than observed are needed. Moreover, z=0 gas fractions are low enough that while they have some effect on the magnitude of outflows required, the slope of the gas fraction--stellar mass relation does not strongly affect our conclusions on how the wind efficiencies must scale with galaxy mass. Despite systematic uncertainties in the normalization and slope of the mass-metallicity relation, we show that the metal expulsion efficiency zetaw=(Zw/Zg)etaw (where Zw is the wind metallicitiy and Zg is the interstellar medium metallicity) must be both high and scale steeply with mass. Specifically, we show that zetaw >> 1 and zetaw proportional to vvir^-3 or steeper. In contrast, momentum- or energy-driven outflow models suggest that etaw should scale as vvir^-1 or vvir^-2, respectively, implying that the Zw-Mstar relation should be shallower than the Zg-Mstar relation. [abridged]

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.