Paper detail

Constraints on secret neutrino interactions after Planck

(Abridged) Neutrino interactions beyond the standard model may affect the cosmological evolution and can be constrained through observations. We consider the possibility that neutrinos possess secret scalar or pseudoscalar interactions mediated by the Nambu-Goldstone boson of a still unknown spontaneously broken global $U(1)$ symmetry, as in, e.g. , Majoron models. In such scenarios, neutrinos still decouple at $T\simeq 1$ MeV, but become tightly coupled again ('recouple') at later stages of the cosmological evolution. We use available observations of CMB anisotropies, including Planck 2013 and the joint BICEP2/Planck 2015 data, to derive constraints on the quantity $γ_{νν}^4$, parameterizing the neutrino collision rate due to (pseudo)scalar interactions. We consider both a minimal extension of the standard $Λ$CDM model, and scenarios with extra relativistic species or non-vanishing tensors. We find a typical constraint $γ_{νν}^4 < 0.9\times 10^{-27}$ (95% C.L.), implying an upper limit on the redshift $z_{rec}$ of neutrino recoupling $< 8500$. In the framework of Majoron models, the upper limit on $γ_{νν}$ roughly translates on a constraint $g < 8.2\times 10^{-7}$ on the Majoron-neutrino coupling constant $g$. In general, the data show a weak ($\sim 1σ$) but intriguing preference for non-zero values of $γ_{νν}^4$, with best fits in the range $γ_{νν}^4 = (0.15 - 0.35)\times 10^{-27}$, depending on the particular dataset. This is more evident when either observations from ACT and SPT are included, or the possibility of non-vanishing tensor modes is considered. In particular, for the minimal model $Λ$CDM +$γ_{νν}$ and including the Planck 2013, ACT and SPT data, we report $γ_{νν}^4=( 0.45^{+0.15}_{-0.38} )\times10^{-27}$ ($200 < z_{rec} < 5700$) at 68% confidence level.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.