Paper detail

Constraints on Scalar Spectral Index from Latest Observational Measurements

Recently, the nine-year data release of the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP9) found that the inflationary models with the scalar spectral index n_s \geq 1 are excluded at about 5σconfidence level. In this paper, we set the new limits on the scalar spectral index in different cosmological models combining the WMAP9 data with the small-scale cosmic microwave background measurement from the South Pole Telescope, baryon acoustic oscillation data, Hubble Telescope measurements of the Hubble constant, and supernovae luminosity distance data. In most of extended cosmological models, e.g. with a dark energy equation of state, the constraints on n_s do not change significantly. The Harrison-Zel'dovich-Peebles (HZ) scale invariant spectrum is still disfavored at more than 4σconfidence level. However, when considering the model with a number of relativistic species N_{eff}, we obtain the limit on the spectral index of n_s=0.980\pm0.011 (1σ), due to the strong degeneracy between n_s and N_{eff}. The HZ spectrum now is still consistent with the current data at 95% confidence level.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.