Paper detail

Constraints on Reionization and Source Properties from the Absorption Spectra of z>6.2 Quasars

We make use of hydrodynamical simulations of the intergalactic medium (IGM) to create model quasar absorption spectra. We compare these model spectra with the observed Keck spectra of three z>6.2 quasars with full Gunn-Peterson troughs: SDSS J1148+5251 (z=6.42), SDSS J1030+0524 (z=6.28), and SDSS J1623+3112 (z=6.22). We fit the probability density distributions (PDFs) of the observed Ly alpha optical depths with those generated from the simulation, by exploring a range of values for the size of the quasar's surrounding HII region, R_S, the volume-weighted mean neutral hydrogen fraction in the ambient IGM, x_H, and the quasar's ionizing photon emissivity, N_Q. In order to avoid averaging over possibly large sightline-to-sightline fluctuations in IGM properties, we analyze each observed quasar independently. We find the following results for J1148+5251, J1030+0524, and J1623+3112: The best-fit sizes R_S are 40, 41, and 29 (comoving) Mpc, respectively. These constraints are tight, with only ~ 10% uncertainties, comparable to those caused by redshift--determination errors. The best-fit values of N_Q are 2.1, 1.3, and 0.9 x 10^{57} s^{-1}, respectively, with a factor of ~ 2 uncertainty in each case. Finally, the best--fit values of x_H are 0.16, 1.0, and 1.0, respectively. The uncertainty in the case of J1148+5251 is large, and x_H is not well constrained. However, for both J1030+0524 and J1623+3112, we find a significant lower limit of x_H >~ 0.033. Our method is different from previous analyses of the GP absorption spectra of these quasars, and our results strengthen the evidence that the rapid end--stage of reionization is occurring near z ~ 6.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.